Amazon recently announced it is opening its massive supply chain and logistics network to all businesses, including companies that do not sell on Amazon. The move expands Amazon’s logistics business beyond its own operations, opening its network, originally built for Amazon, to outside companies.During the Gartner Supply Chain Symposium/Xpo in Orlando last week, Vice President Peter Larsen discussed what led to the decision, how customers pushed Amazon in this direction, and why the company believes delivery speed and reliability can directly drive business growth. Larsen, who has been with Amazon for nearly 20 years, also explained how Amazon plans to scale the new offering and what companies can expect from the service.SC247: What changed internally that made Amazon decide to open its supply chain network to outside companies?Larsen: A couple of things. One was the fact that our Amazon supply chain capabilities had already been opened up to sellers a number of years ago. That went great. Those sellers began asking us to use it for their off-Amazon volume.Once that started happening and got to scale, it became a pretty obvious next step. We're already doing off-Amazon volume. It looks like it's filling a need, so let's go ahead and open it up to non-sellers as well. Customers were asking for it.The second thing is that when you build things for internal teams, you sometimes make decisions based on assumptions about who your customers are. We had to spend some time detaching there. A lot of our services assumed you were an Amazon seller and had an Amazon seller ID.If you didn't have an Amazon seller ID, our systems didn't really know what to do with it. We had to detach that a little bit.And finally, there were some aspects of our services that we had to work on externalizing. For example, bulk distribution, which is a pretty core part of any 3PL, is something we didn't really have until this year.Please click here to read the complete article.
Blog
Subtitle
The U.S. Trade Representative is proposing additional tariffs of either 10% or 12.5% for 60 trading partners based on investigations that found a "failure to impose and effectively enforce" stopping goods made with forced labor entering the U.S., per a Tuesday news release.
A proposed 10% tariff would apply to trading partners that impose a forced labor import prohibition, have committed to install such a measure through a reciprocal trade agreement, or "imposed a partial regime with the effect of preventing the importation of certain forced labor goods," per the press release. These partners include Canada, Mexico, the European Union, the United Kingdom and Taiwan, according to a Federal Register notice.
For all other investigated economies, including China, India, Brazil, Japan, South Korea and Vietnam, the additional tariff rate would be 12.5%, per the notice. Mao Ning, spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry, said Wednesday that no one stands to benefit from a tariff war or trade war.
The USTR did not provide planned implementation dates of the proposed tariffs.
Exemptions apply to all parts subject to Section 232 tariffs and goods compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, per the notice. They also apply to raw materials that could result in domestic supply shortages if hit with the additional levies, and certain products that can't be grown or produced in sufficient amounts in the U.S. A full list of items proposed for exemption is available in the annex to the notice.
The proposed tariffs stem from Section 301 investigations initiated on March 12. The USTR said the failure of the 60 trading partners to block forced labor imports is enabling firms using such methods "to produce goods at lower cost and thereby distort market conditions for firms that do not use forced labor," per the release. The issue harms U.S. commerce by subjecting domestic producers to unfair competition, the release added.
“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labor is unacceptable," USTR Jamieson Greer said in the release. "This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field. We will no longer tolerate this disparity."
While some trading partners have taken steps to block the importation of goods made with forced labor, they "must do more to ensure that trade does not perversely encourage and entrench forced labor globally," Greer added.
The USTR is also proposing a mechanism to allow a certain amount of apparel and textile imports from some economies at a reduced Section 301 tariff rate, according to the notice. Through this mechanism, the volume of reduced-duty imports from a trading partner would equal the quantity of textile exports from the U.S. to that partner.
"A certain volume of apparel and textile imports would also be allowed to enter the United States at the reduced Section 301 rate based on the volume of U.S. cotton and cotton products a trading partner imports from the United States during a certain period of time," the notice said.
Public comment submissions on the proposed actions are due by July 6, with the USTR set to hold hearings the following day.
This article was written by Max Garland from ESG Dive and was legally licensed through the DiveMarketplace by Industry Dive. Please direct all licensing questions to legal@industrydive.com.
Blog
Subtitle
Context for U.S. importers
Context: Nvidia's device AI shift affects Landed Cost calculations for U.S. importers directly.
This matters because new AI hardware changes freight, duty, and inventory profiles rapidly.
Use DDP shipping from China to reduce landed cost uncertainty and customs exposure.
What Nvidia announced at Computex 2026
Nvidia introduced RTX Spark, a chip built for Windows PCs to support agents locally.
RTX Spark released in partnership with Microsoft for agentic AI on devices.
DGX Station for Windows announced, expected in Q4, runs 1 trillion parameter models.
Nvidia described RTX Spark as a superchip and called it "the personal AI computer."
Supply chain timing and refresh cycles
Enterprise AI PC adoption slowed near the end of 2025, per Gartner research.
The Futurum Group predicted slower AI PC shipment growth in late 2025 and 2026.
As PC refresh cycles start in 2027, enterprises may accelerate AI PC upgrades globally.
The global AI PC market could grow at a 38% CAGR to $350 billion by 2030.
How this affects Landed Cost, duties, and tariffs
Higher-spec AI PCs change product classification and landed cost calculations for importers.
Section 301 Tariffs and HTS classifications can materially alter duty payable at entry.
CBP compliance requires updated commercial invoices and technical descriptions for AI components.
Freight rate shifts and container availability will also alter per-unit landed cost.
Track container and rate trends with market tools like container shipping rates to budget accurately.
Supply Chain Resilience and inventory strategy
Bringing AI inference on device shifts compute away from centralized cloud to deskside endpoints.
This shift affects inventory pooling, lead times, and MRP planning for IT procurement teams.
Importers should model scenarios for component shortages and staggered deliveries across regions.
Operational actions for importers and compliance teams
Audit product taxonomy and HTS codes immediately. Ensure technical specifications match customs declarations.
Update landed cost models to include higher freight, duty, and insurance assumptions. Recalculate SKU margins accordingly.
Engage carriers and forwarders with AI hardware experience. Confirm handling and temperature or ESD requirements.
Negotiate DDP or delivered terms when possible to transfer customs risk. Clarify who pays duties and taxes.
Plan inventory for 2027 refresh cycles and test staggered deliveries. Mitigate single-source disruptions early.
Strategic implications for technology procurement
Ranjit Atwal of Gartner says PCs can become part of enterprise infrastructure strategies.
Nvidia’s agent orchestration strategy implies coordination across cloud, on-premises, and device layers.
Procurement teams must align sourcing, TCO models, and contract terms to support distributed AI compute.
Key Takeaways
Nvidia's RTX Spark and DGX Station affect landed cost, duties, and classification immediately.
Importers should update HTS codes, landed cost models, and DDP negotiations now.
Prepare inventory and procurement plans ahead of expected 2027 PC refresh cycles.
Blog
Subtitle
Context
April data shows U.S. imports falling, driven by Section 301 Tariffs impacts.
S&P Global Market Intelligence reports a 12th consecutive monthly decline.
April imports totaled roughly 2.635 million TEU, down 5.2% year-over-year.
For importers, shifts affect landed cost, inventory timing, and CBP compliance.
See recent U.S. import data for trend context U.S. import data.
April import overview
April’s annual decline was larger than March’s 0.4% decrease.
The month marked weaker flows for materials and capital goods sectors.
S&P noted the decline pace may reverse with stronger new manufacturing orders.
Sector drivers: materials and capital goods
Materials and capital goods paced the April decline, per S&P Global.
Shortages in metals and petrochemicals relate to the Middle East conflict.
Direct imports from the Middle East fell by 28.5% year-over-year in April.
Tariffs and Section 122 timing
Most consumer durables face Section 122 duties at a 10% rate.
Section 301 reviews on manufacturing capacity and labor costs could raise duties.
Current Section 122 duties are likely to expire in late July without action.
Operational impacts: landed cost and CBP compliance
Higher or extended tariffs will increase landed cost and compliance workload.
Importers must update cost build-ups and HTS classifications for tariff scenarios.
CBP compliance teams should prepare for retrospective duty assessments and potential audits.
Recalculate landed cost models regularly. This ensures pricing covers tariff and duty changes.
Document origin and production details. Such documentation supports tariff mitigation and audits.
Align inventory valuation with updated duties. This limits margin erosion and accounting surprises.
Peak season and inventory timing
Historically, peak consumer shipments arrive in August through October.
S&P expects peak shipments to pick up toward that August to October window.
Goods often exit Asian factories from late June onward for those peak arrivals.
Recommendations for importers
Importers should stress-test supply chains for tariff and material-shortage scenarios.
Levers include alternative sourcing, port diversification, and adjusted reorder points.
Increase visibility into supplier lead times and buffer stocks.
Negotiate flexible terms with carriers and forwarders.
Use DDP options to simplify customs clearance and landed cost certainty.
For DDP pricing clarity, consider tools that model delivery and customs costs DDP shipping cost.
Strategic actions and contingency steps
Maintain a clear tariff response plan with triggers and owners.
Update contracts to reflect potential duty passthrough and inventory timing changes.
Stress-test cash flow for possible tariff increases and inventory build requirements.
Scenario planning: model tariff increases up to 10% for consumer durables. This quantifies margin and pricing exposure.
Sourcing contingency: secure secondary suppliers in ASEAN and other regions. This reduces single-source risk from affected suppliers.
Key Takeaways
April imports were roughly 2.635 million TEU, down 5.2% year-over-year.
Tariff timing and Section 122 expiration in late July raise landed cost risk.
Importers should update landed cost, reinforce CBP compliance, and plan sourcing contingencies.
Looking at Amazon’s push to open Its logistics network to all
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!